[Slashdot-mailer] Slashdot Daily Report (11/11/2000)

David Jacoby jacoby@ecn.purdue.edu
Sat, 11 Nov 2000 11:00:02 -0500 (EST)


Slashdot Daily Report		( http://slashdot.org/ )
News for Nerds. Stuff That Matters.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

Registrations Now Accepted For Asian Domain Names
  A articles article from the "aju-massi-sumnidad" department
  sent by timothy

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/11/10/1357253 

	Eric Sun was among the first to point out that as
	of Thursday evening, VeriSign has begun accepting
	Chinese, Japanese and Korean domain names. "This
	increases the possible characters from 37 (26
	letters, 10 numerals, and hyphen) to 40,282. Find
	more information [see this AP story]." snrsamy
	points to the same story as featured on C|Net .
	jamie suggests reading the technical lowdown at
	VeriSign.

	--------------------

Embracing Insanity
  A books article from the "history-of-OS-development" department
  sent by JonKatz

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/09/25/2233200 



	--------------------

New Optical Disk That Holds 140GB
  A articles article from the "looks-like-vapor-smells-like-vapor" department
  sent by CmdrTaco

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/11/10/150251 

	NoCashValue writes "There is an article on Wired
	News about a new optical disk that can hold up to
	140GB of data on a disk the size of a CD ROM."
	Still pretty vaporouus, but they claim a demo is
	forthcoming at Comdex.

	--------------------

eLection '04
  A articles article from the "not-too-close-to-call" department
  sent by jamie

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/11/10/0011233 

	Until this week, I've been unconvinced by those
	who say the U.S. election process needs to be
	conducted with computers instead of paper, pencil,
	and punchcards. I've changed my mind. It's time to
	take a good hard look at our ancient voting
	system, and bring it up to date. When today's
	14-year-olds go to vote in the 2004 elections,
	will they still take the pencil from the
	volunteer, slide the punchcard into the molded
	plastic, and turn the weird knobs? Or will they
	use the technology they've grown up with? My
	change of heart came while listening to an NPR
	story last night. Election results for one county
	in Michigan were held up for two hours because
	some volunteers with ballots were barricaded in
	the building by a bear. A bear! What century is
	this? There are some fair concerns about moving to
	a more-than-just-dead-trees voting system. We have
	to consider what the impact will be on voter
	enfranchisement. A change that makes it possible
	for the rich to vote by telepathy, for example,
	while the poor have to drive a hundred miles
	uphill both ways (to access a non-telepathic
	voting booth) would not be exactly democratic.
	Would it have been fair, in 2000, for the middle
	class to be able to vote from the comfort of their
	homes and jobs, while the poor and homeless had to
	get to a voting booth? I don't know. But my best
	guess is that, by 2004, this won't be a question
	anymore. Plot the percentage of lower-income homes
	with internet access from 1996 to 2000, and then
	extrapolate another four years. So if it should be
	done, how can it be done? There are five key
	issues to solve: authorization, anonymity, data
	confidence, UI, and security. I propose a system
	in which each voting booth runs a webserver which
	logs votes (without identification) to two
	internal media (hard disk and floppy would be
	good, see below). Once the polls close, each
	booth's computer can be totalled and sent over the
	internet to the state's central server. Meanwhile,
	any computer that speaks https on the internet
	would become a voting booth of its own, running
	slightly different software. Each state's official
	results could be in an hour after its polls close.
	Which beats the ten-day waiting period we have now
	for our overseas ballots. Authorization isn't
	really that hard: When you register to vote, you
	(by default) get a password delivered by
	snail-mail a week before the election. Tampering
	with that mail is a federal offense, of course. On
	election day you use secure http to sign in from
	anywhere with your name, address and password.
	Lose the password? Sorry, you don't get the
	comfort of home/work; you go to the voting booth
	with everyone else. Anonymity is trivial; any logs
	with identifying information either don't get
	stored, or get wiped immediately. Computers crash.
	Data confidence means the servers write the votes
	to multiple media: network, hard drive, flash RAM.
	A dot-matrix printer makes a good emergency backup
	medium. This system also needs a dirt-simple GUI
	for voters connecting from home or work. No
	butterfly webpages necessary; click a name, and
	get a confirmation screen that shows you name,
	party, (importantly) photo, and big "yes" and "no"
	buttons. At the voting booth it can be even
	simpler, using touch-screens. Security is, of
	course, always a problem. Secure http effectively
	eliminates the man-in-the-middle attack, so the
	main worry are that an attacker will be able to
	run unauthorized code on a government computer
	which could (read) correlate my name with my vote
	or (write) change my vote. I'm going to go out on
	a limb and say that a completely open-sourced
	system, from the kernel up, combined with
	clean-room installations at a secure location, can
	make these concerns minor by comparison to
	existing vote-fraud concerns. (My vote would go to
	OpenBSD, Apache, and Mozilla, though of course
	good luck predicting what will be best four years
	from now.) Also, net admins overseeing the effort
	need to have enough access to track and lock out
	attackers, but obviously they can't have access to
	change the election results. Lock them in a room
	for the day with a hundred video cameras tracking
	everything they do, like the officers on
	missile-launch duty. Many net admins will find
	this a relaxed and enjoyable work environment
	compared to their current jobs. There are many
	problems that have to be solved -- please bring up
	the ones I haven't mentioned here, let's start the
	debate! My hunch is that they can be solved. And
	the overriding question must be, will it be an
	improvement over the current system? Given that
	Florida's election is being decided by a 400-vote
	difference, with 19,000 botched votes thrown out,
	I'd say the impossibility of clicking on two
	presidential choices at the same time makes this
	system a huge win. The broken user interface on
	our existing punch-cards system is probably going
	to give us the wrong President of the United
	States. How much worse could a digital system
	really be? I don't claim to have all the answers,
	but I know what century it is, and the time for
	Little House on the Prairie nonsense is over.
	Let's make this happen for 2004. I'll give my last
	word to Andre Uratsuka Manoel, a partner at the
	internet firm Insite, in Brazil. (Props to TBTF
	for putting Andre and me in touch.) Brazil has a
	100% electronic election. On election day I go my
	"electoral section," identify myself, sign my
	name. The "section president" then types in my
	code and I walk to the booth which is in a corner
	of the room where no one can see my vote. I then
	type the number of my candidate, see his/her photo
	and press "confirm." The voting machines store the
	votes in at least three different places: a floppy
	disk (which is locked), a flash card and the
	internal hard disk. There are written procedures
	for any kind of failure I could think of and
	back-up machines readily available. Those machines
	can connect to a phone line and send their results
	to the Election Court of the state. The results
	are proclamed extremely fast. On the mayoral
	run-off elections that happened 2 weeks ago,
	results were out 2 hours after the election in the
	city I live in (Sao Paulo, with about 6 million
	voters) and 6 hours after it in the last city in
	which there was a run-off. In my home city the
	results came out a little after the election sites
	closed and the result was proclamed with the
	winner having 40 thousand votes more than the
	second place (0.4% of 1 million votes). In the
	first round of elections in Sao Paulo, the third
	place contestant lost the ticket for the run-off
	elections by less than 0.1%. The one who lost
	didn't even think of contesting the results
	because no one thought there were any kind of
	frauds. In the first round, 100 million voters
	(about the same as the active voters in US) in 5
	thousand cities chose their mayors and councelors.
	All the results were proclaimed 30 hours after the
	voting closed. This happens in a country that has
	a much lower level of literacy, technology-savvy
	and of money as the U.S. Remember that some mayors
	were chosen in places hours away from anyplace
	else (even by plane), i.e. in the middle of the
	rain forest. Those places don't have electricity.
	Of course there were complaints, but not because
	of the electoral process. Mostly they were due to
	campaigning on the election day, voter
	transportation and coercion. (Updates: Dave Riesz
	mentioned Riverside County, California, which has
	an electronic voting system already in place.
	Their 2000 primary turnout was the highest in 20
	years, which may or may not mean anything. That
	led me to the California Internet Voting Task
	Force which looks interesting. Don Wegeng pointed
	me to RISKS thoughts by Douglas Jones. Brian
	Dunbar points out "Hurrah for Slow Recounts" by
	the always-interesting Ellen Ullman. Lee Coursey
	passes along Elizabeth Ferrill's Discussion of
	Electronic Voting. James McCann, a programmer at
	VoteHere.net, says my description is "not terribly
	far off but very incomplete" -- I'll take that as
	a compliment -- check out his site and
	SecurePoll.com too. And finally, a story in Salon
	that makes my point better than I could:
	"Confessions of a Florida Poll Worker." If you
	have more links or information, email me.)

	--------------------

The Net As New Jerusalem, Part Two
  A features article from the "last-days-of-politics-(cont.)" department
  sent by JonKatz

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/10/31/2251226 



	--------------------

Buy Your CDs From Your PCS Phone
  A articles article from the "interesting-commericial-application" department
  sent by Hemos

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/11/10/1457203 

	guido_sst writes: "SprintPCS has inked a new deal
	with *CD to allow its users to buy CDs with their
	PCS phones. Basically, you hear a song on the
	radio, dial *CD (*23) on your PCS phone, type in
	the station's call letter and your credit card
	number, and viola, you just bought that band's CD.
	The service is also available for wireless members
	of the 3Com Palm family. Read more at starcd.com."

	--------------------

AOL/Transmeta/Gateway Internet Appliance Launch
  A articles article from the "coming-at-you" department
  sent by Hemos

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/11/10/1539238 

	A reader writes "America Online and Gateway are
	launching their Linux/Transmeta internet appliance
	today. The webcast can be seen here." The webcast
	is in Real Audio - you can also find our original
	coverage of this, back in late May 2000.

	--------------------

Say Goodbye To The Netpliance i-opener
  A articles article from the "b'bai!" department
  sent by timothy

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/11/10/188210 

	HiyaPower writes "Netpliance announced that they
	have thrown in the towel and will no longer
	produce their internet appliance. This follows the
	failure of web appliances by Virgin, and a number
	of others. It looks like even grandma wants a good
	isp when she logs on the net and that bundling
	cute hardware with inferior service just doesn't
	cut the mustard. This will be a sad note to all of
	those who have yet to buy the unit that cost $400
	to produce for a fraction of that amount. Get'm
	while you can, cuz they don't make'm no more..."
	CEO John McHale says in that announcement: "We
	plan to reposition Netpliance from a direct
	consumer Internet appliance service provider to an
	enabling infrastructure and managed services
	company." Perhaps there will be some closeouts?
	jensend sent in this C|Net coverage as well.

	--------------------

Florida Court Overturns AT&T Cable Ordinance
  A articles article from the "we-love-florida-in-so-many-ways" department
  sent by michael

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/11/11/0347224 

	jothenull writes: "A Florida judge ruled that a
	"Broward County ordinance requiring cable giant
	AT&T to allow rival Internet access to their
	systems violated the First Amendment."" Available
	wherever AP articles are found. Since cable
	systems get a monopoly from local municipalities,
	it only seems fair that they be required to
	fulfill certain requirements - carrying a
	diversity of programming, permitting access to a
	variety of ISPs - but the cable services are
	fighting their part of the bargain tooth and nail.

	--------------------

Fast-moving Neutron Star from Hubble
  A science article from the "tides" department
  sent by michael

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/11/11/058258 

	CEHT writes: "Recently, the Hubble discovered a
	fast moving neutron star which is 10 trillion
	times denser than steel, 100 times faster than a
	supersonic jet. Here is the article from CNN.com."
	If we had a General Products hull, we could send a
	probe to investigate.

	--------------------

Future of Journalism
  A articles article from the "nostradamus" department
  sent by michael

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/11/11/0417237 

	rhysweatherley writes: "This year's Andrew Olle
	Lecture was presented by Eric Beecher of Text
	Media, and deals with the current and future state
	of "real" journalism, including the impact of the
	online world on traditional journalism (not all of
	it good). It is a good insight from one of the
	media's insiders in Australia. More information on
	the Andrew Olle Lecture series can be found here."
	I thought this was interesting. A little different
	than the usual Slashdot fare, but good reading
	nonetheless.

	--------------------

Microsoft is Indoctrinating Children, Shouldn't We?
  A askslashdot article from the "getting-the-tools-in-the-hands-of-the-next-generation" department
  sent by Cliff

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/11/10/1955217 

	wildgift writes: "This is probably not news to
	some young people, but some of the older people
	here should be aware that Microsoft runs a wide
	ranging IT/Programming curriculum project, called
	Mainfunction, that teaches young people to program
	using Microsoft tools. The obvious issue is: is
	anyone leveraging the education-friendly Unix
	environment to create a similar program? This is a
	huge opportunity. So far, I've only found this
	Python article." If Microsoft is getting their
	tools in the hands of the programmers of the
	future, what can we do to achieve the same?
	Wouldn't it be much better if kids could take a
	look at development on several different platforms
	so that they can better use the technology when
	they are professionals rather than settling on
	"what they know"?

	--------------------

Fast-Moving Neutron Star From Hubble
  A science article from the "tides" department
  sent by michael

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/11/11/058258 

	CEHT writes: "Recently, the Hubble discovered a
	fast moving neutron star which is 10 trillion
	times denser than steel, 100 times faster than a
	supersonic jet. Here is the article from CNN.com."
	If we had a General Products hull, we could send a
	probe to investigate.

	--------------------

Future Of Journalism
  A articles article from the "nostradamus" department
  sent by michael

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/11/11/0417237 

	rhysweatherley writes: "This year's Andrew Olle
	Lecture was presented by Eric Beecher of Text
	Media, and deals with the current and future state
	of "real" journalism, including the impact of the
	online world on traditional journalism (not all of
	it good). It is a good insight from one of the
	media's insiders in Australia. More information on
	the Andrew Olle Lecture series can be found here."
	I thought this was interesting. A little different
	than the usual Slashdot fare, but good reading
	nonetheless.

	--------------------

Microsoft Is Indoctrinating Children, Shouldn't We?
  A askslashdot article from the "getting-the-tools-in-the-hands-of-the-next-generation" department
  sent by Cliff

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/11/10/1955217 

	wildgift writes: "This is probably not news to
	some young people, but some of the older people
	here should be aware that Microsoft runs a wide
	ranging IT/Programming curriculum project, called
	Mainfunction, that teaches young people to program
	using Microsoft tools. The obvious issue is: is
	anyone leveraging the education-friendly Unix
	environment to create a similar program? This is a
	huge opportunity. So far, I've only found this
	Python article." If Microsoft is getting their
	tools in the hands of the programmers of the
	future, what can we do to achieve the same?
	Wouldn't it be much better if kids could take a
	look at development on several different platforms
	so that they can better use the technology when
	they are professionals rather than settling on
	"what they know"?

	--------------------


The info is Rob Malda's
The code is mine

MOTD: -----------------------------------

	I am no longer associated with Purdue, except for being a former
	student, former employee, and active member of the Linux Users Group.
	As such, I'll either be moving this service to another server or
	killing it entirely. Your input is requested as to what you'd like.

	Then again, when was the last time I changed the MOTD? And when was 
	last time it was read?